The Structures and Order of Orthodox Monastic Life
(The Monastic typikon or rule and how it structures the life of the monastic community, how non-monastics should conduct themselves when visiting a monastery, the essence of monastic spirituality and the chief purpose and goal of monasticism.)
By Fr. Mark
A monastery structures its life according to a rule (τипиκόν, уставу). The rule establishes the basic code of conduct within the community, the structures of authority, the liturgical ordo, and the schedule of prayer, work, and rest. Each monastery has its own rule. Nevertheless, in the Christian East, the Ascetikon of Saint Basil the Great, the rules of Saint Sabbas the Sanctified and Saint Theodore the Studite have become the models upon which monasteries have formulated their own rules, as have the rules of Saint Augustine of Hippo and Saint Benedict of Nursia done in the Christian West. According to the Church’s sacred canons, a monastery may ONLY be established and EXIST with the blessing of the bishop of the diocese. Presiding over the monastic community is the abbot (in his absences is the bishop), who is the spiritual father and leader of the community. He may delegate his authority to various deans within the community.
With this in mind, a monastery resembles more a family than a parish. Healthy Christian families live according to their own rule, even if this rule remains unwritten. Households have rules by which the family and even guests must abide. Heading the family are the father and the mother, who may delegate authority and responsibility to the older children. Families live according to a schedule: there is a time to wake up and go to sleep, there are times for meals, study, chores, and recreation. Christian families ought to have an icon corner where they gather together for daily prayer. They gather with other families at a parish on Sundays, feast days, and on other occasions.
Monks arise at an appointed time in the morning and begin their day with an assigned rule of prayer in their cells. After this time of private prayer, monks gather in their church for the morning offices (Midnight Office and Matins), often followed by the Divine Liturgy. They then proceed to the refectory (dining hall) for the morning meal. In monasteries, meals are typically eaten in silence while a reader will read from the lives of the saints or other works that are spiritually edifying.
The meal concludes with a prayer of thanksgiving, after which the monks begin their assigned work, called obediences. If a mid-day meal is offered, the monks will again gather in the refectory, following the same order and discipline as the morning meal. Work continues until the mid-afternoon. The liturgical day concludes with the reading of the 9th hour in the church, after which Vespers is served, beginning the new liturgical day. After Vespers, the monks gather once again in the refectory for the evening meal and then back to the church for Small Compline. Eventually the monks retire to their cells for their evening rule of prayer and sleep. On Sundays, feast days, and other appropriate occasions, they rest from their labors.
The heart of a monastery is prayer. The Holy Apostle Paul instructs Christians to “pray without ceasing” (1 Thessalonians 5:17). The fruit of monastic prayer and worship is witnessed by the fact that the liturgical services and private devotionals which Orthodox Christians attend, participate, and pray come from the monasteries. Parishes, for pastoral and practical reasons, often shorten or even omit certain services. Monasteries, on the other hand, keep a stricter observance of the Church’s Typikon. Even outside the divine offices and their cell rules, monks strive for continuous prayer to God.
In the Acts of the Apostles, we read that the first Christians “continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in the prayers. And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. And all that believed were together, and had all things common; and sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart” (Acts 2:42-46).
Monastics maintain the fervency of the Early Church. This life of common prayer, worship, fellowship, labor, and struggle is a blessing to the entire Church. For this reason, pilgrimage and material support by those remaining in the world continues today as part of the Church’s Sacred Tradition. When we visit a monastery and participate in their life, we find renewal in our own spiritual life.
‘The best way to penetrate Orthodox spirituality is to enter it through monasticism’
Paul Evdokimov, L’Orthodoxie ( Paris 1959)
The monastic life first emerged as a definite institution in Egypt and Syria during the fourth century, and from there it spread rapidly across Christendom. It is no coincidence that monasticism ashould have developed immediately after Constatine’s conversion, at the very time when the persecutions ceased and Christianity became fashionable. The monks with their austerities were martyrs in an age when martyrdom of blood no longer existed; they formed the counterbalance to an established Christendom.
People in Byzantine society were in danger of forgetting that Byzantium was an image and symbol, not the reality; they ran the risk of identifying the kingdom of God with an earthly kingdom. The monks by their withdrawal from society into the desert fulfilled a prophetic and eschatological ministry in the life of the Church. They reminded Christians that the kingdom of God is not of this world.
Monasticism has taken three chief forms, all of which had appeared in Egypt by the year 350, and all of which are still to be found in the Orthodox Church today. There are first the hermits, ascetics leading the solitary life in huts and caves, and even in tombs, among the branches of trees, or on the tops of pillars. The great model of the eremitic life is the father of monasticism himself, St Anthony of Egypt ( 251-356 ). Secondly there is community life, where monks dwell together under a common rule and in a regularly constituted monastery. Here the great pioneer was St Pachomius of Egypt ( 286-346 ), author of a rule later used by St Benedict in the west.
…in Orthodoxy a monk’s primary task is the life of prayer, and it is through this that he serves others. It is not so much what a monk does that matters, as what he is.
Finally there is a form of the monastic life intermediate between the first two, the semi-eremitic life, a ‘middle way’ where instead of a single highly organized community there is a loosely knit group of small settlements, each settlement containing perhaps between two and six members living together under the guidance of an elder. The great centers of the semi-eremitic life in Egypt were Nitria and Scetis, which by the end of the fourth century had produced many outstanding monks – Ammon the founder of Nitria, Macarius of Egypt and Macarius of Alexandria, Evagrius of Pontus, and Arsenius the Great. ( This semi-eremitic system is found not only in the east but in the far west, in Celtic Christianity .) From its very beginnings the monastic life was seen, in both east and west, as a vocation for women as well as men, and throughout the Byzantine world there were numerous communities of nuns.
Because of its monasteries, fourth-century Egypt was regarded as a second Holy Land, and travellers to Jerusalem felt their pilgrimage to be incomplete unless it included the ascetic houses of the Nile. In the fifth and sixth centuries leadership in the monastic movement shifted to Palestine, with St Euthymius the Great ( † 473 ) and his disciple St Sabas ( † 532 ). The monastery founded by St Sabas in the Jordan valley can claim an unbroken history to the present day; it was so this community that John of Damascus belonged. Almost as old is another important house with an unbroken history to the present, the monastery of St Catherine at Mount Sinai, founded by the Emperor Justinian ( reigned 527-65 ). With Palestine and Sinai in Arab hands, monastic pre-eminence in the Byzantine Empire passed in the ninth century to the monastery of Stoudios in Constantinople. St Theodore, who became Abbot here in 799, reactivated the community and revised its rule, attracting vast numbers of monks.
Since the tenth century the chief centre of orthodox monasticism has been Athos, a rocky peninsula in North Greece jutting out into the Aegean and culminating at its tip in a peak 6,670 feet high. Known as ‘the Holy Mountain’, Athos contains twenty ‘ruling’ monasteries and a large number os smaller houses, as well as hermits’ cells; the whole peninsula is given up entirely to monastic settlements, and in the days of its greatest expansion it is said to have contained nearly forty thousand monks. The Great Lavra, the oldest of the twenty ruling monasteries, has by itself produced 26 Patriarchs and more than 144 bishops: this gives some idea of the importance of Athos in Orthodox history.
There are no ‘Orders’ in Orthodox monasticism.
In the west a m onk belongs to the Cartusian, the Cistercian, or some other Order; in the east he is simply a member of the one great fellowship which includes all monks and nuns, although of course he is attached to a particular monastic house. Western writers simetimes refer to Orthodox monks as ‘Basilian monks’ or ‘monks of the Basilian Order’, but this is not correct. St Basil is and important figure in Orthodox monasticism, but he founded no Order, and although two of his works are known as the Longer Rules and the Shorter Rules, these are in no sense comparable to the Rule of St Benedict.
A characteristic figure in Orthodox monasticism is the ‘elder’ or ‘old man’ ( Greek gerõn; Russian starets, plural startsy ). The elder is a monk of spiritual discernment and wisdom, whom others – either monks or people in the world – adopt as their guide and spiritual director.
He is sometimes a priest, but often a lay monk; he receives no special ordination or appointment to the work of eldership, but is guided to it by the direct inspiration of the Spirit. A woman as well as a man may be called to this ministry, for Orthodoxy has its ‘spiritual mothers’ as well as its ‘spiritual fathers’. The elder sees in a concrete and practical way what the will of God is in relation is in relation to each person who comes to consult him: this is the elder’s special gift or charisma. The earliest and most celebrated of the monastic startsy was St Antony himself. The first part of his life, from eighteen to fifty-five, he spent in withdrawal and solitude; then, though still living in the desert, he abandoned his life of strict enclosure, and began to receive visitors. A group of disciples gathered around him, and besides these disciples there was a far larger circle of people who came, often from a long distance, to ask his advice; so great was the stream of visitors that, as Antony’s biographer Athanasius put it, he became a psysician to all Egypt.
Antony has had many successors, and in most of them the same outward pattern of events is found – a withdrawal in order to return. A monk must first withdraw, and in silence must learn the truth about himself and God. Then, after this long and rigorous preparation in solitude, having gained the gifts of discernment which are required of and elder, he can open the door of his cell and admit the world from which formerly he fled.
Bishop Kallistos ( Timothy ) Ware, The Orthodox Church ( New York 1983)